Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:20
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
What fiber optic setup would you recommend for a small business network?
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Has anyone ever really waited that long and gotten a paper check mailed 20 days ago?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Every Hideo Kojima Game Ranked - IGN
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Inflation slides to 1.9% in Europe, as worries shift from prices to Trump and tariffs - AP News
Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Thank you.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Fatty liver: Symptoms and warning signs seen during the night - Times of India
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.